tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5540166.post113033777942456478..comments2024-03-28T10:44:01.308-07:00Comments on @jspepper: Google Base ... from October 11Jeremyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17859194486093074401noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5540166.post-1131466768157038712005-11-08T08:19:00.000-08:002005-11-08T08:19:00.000-08:00Anonymous, I think with Base you have to submit yo...Anonymous, I think with Base you have to submit your site manually, rather than sing xml feeds (ror).Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5540166.post-1130422967897669682005-10-27T07:22:00.000-07:002005-10-27T07:22:00.000-07:00Isn't Google Base essentially like ROR - http://ww...Isn't Google Base essentially like ROR - http://www.rorweb.com ?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5540166.post-1130418585064905372005-10-27T06:09:00.000-07:002005-10-27T06:09:00.000-07:00I think the reason its making more of a splash is ...<A HREF="http://early-adopter.blogspot.com/2005/10/google-base-all-your-base-are-belong.html" REL="nofollow" TITLE="early-adopter blog">I think</A> the reason its making more of a splash is that people are seeing that its not just going to be one company (google) moving into another (ebay)'s turf- but it is (or more to the point could be) but rather GOOGLE (super smart people)- doing to process of searching for real things in the world - what it has done to searching for information on the web. Before it was a business story, now its a technology-change society-the future is now! ohmygod! kind of story. Maybe overhyped, sure, but you know, hype is fun, isn't it?earlyadopterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02187019463247269089noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5540166.post-1130392375469483412005-10-26T22:52:00.000-07:002005-10-26T22:52:00.000-07:00Thanks Scott. I did read the story back then, and ...Thanks Scott. I did read the story back then, and thought "oh, interesting, let's see if anyone actually picks this up."<BR/><BR/>It got one hit, in a Google rumor blog. That was it. But, it's not PR, so I didn't care much. ;)Jeremyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17859194486093074401noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5540166.post-1130392181259892642005-10-26T22:49:00.000-07:002005-10-26T22:49:00.000-07:00Jeremy: If you hadn't been goofing off for the pas...Jeremy: If you hadn't been goofing off for the past two weeks, YOU -- as the blogging world's chief Phoenix correspondent -- could have broken this story a long time ago! :)Scott Baradellhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04137057925586819535noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5540166.post-1130387296516053512005-10-26T21:28:00.000-07:002005-10-26T21:28:00.000-07:00Good post ... and the idea of the PBJ not getting ...Good post ... and the idea of the PBJ not getting credit is true, as we know.<BR/><BR/>Someone like one of the "circle chubbies" will blog it and everyone will be linking to them, not PBJ - or you for pointing it out.Roberthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08317050159888690263noreply@blogger.com